Ex-Newpope Benedict-Ratzinger Publicly Washes His Hands Like Pontius Pilate Of Personal Responsibility for Newchurch’s Great Sex & Embezzlement Holocaust
From: The TRADITIO Fathers
Two Heretics Booze It up at the Vatican II Anti-council (1962-1965)
Karl Rahner (Left), Declared under Suspicion of Heresy by Pope John XXIII
Presbyter Josef Ratzinger (Right), the Modernist Leader at the Anti-council
Who Preferred Dressing in a Secular Suit and Tie without Roman Collar
Ratzinger Engineered Replacing the Catholic Church
With the Heretical Newchurch of the New Order in 1964
Ratzinger Takes No Personal Responsibility
For All the Newchurch Sex Crimes against Children
Even though He Was the Prefect of Paedophilia for 24 Years
Instead Ratzinger Fobs off the Responsibility
Onto the “Cultural and Historical Changes” of the 1960s
On April 10, 2019, Ratzinger published a letter simultaneously in German at Klerusblatt, in Italian at Corriere della Sera, and in English at the Catholic News Agency and the National Catholic Register, in which, like a modern-day Pontius Pilate, the guilty Newpope publicly washed his hands of personal responsibility for Newchurch’s Great Sex & Embezzlement Holocaust, claiming instead: “The 1960s did it!”
Ratzinger had claimed in February 2013 that he had to abdicate for health reasons. In fact, it was known that the real reason for his abdication was that the international press was so tired of covering for his support of paedophile Newchurch clergy that the press threatened to expose the details of his activities if he didn’t abdicate. His personal aide-de-camp, Paolo Gabriele, himself tired of Ratzinger’s cover-up, had already given to the press reams of Ratzinger’s confidential documents. Six years later Ratzinger is in fact still alive at age 92 and is still writing.
Benedict-Ratzinger fobs off the responsibility for Newchurch’s Great Sex & Embezzlement Holocaust and the subsequent meltdown of the Newchurch of the New Order, co-founded by him in 1964 in conjunction with the Vatican II Anti-council to replace the Catholic Church with the heretical Newchurch of the New Order, upon the “cultural and historical changes” of the 1960s. He still refuses to take personal responsibility for the paedophile crimes by Newchurch clergy, over which he himself had responsibility, together with the First Paedophile Newpope JPII-Wojtyla, as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith from 1981-2005, then as the Second Paedophile Newpope, from 2005-2013.
JPII-Wojtyla essentially handed off to Ratzinger the responsibility for taking care of paedophile crimes by Newchurch presbyters, Newbishops, and Newcardinals for 24 years. During that time Ratzinger quietly let thousands of Newchurch sex criminals get away with their vile sex crimes against children, only to repeat those crimes against other children time and time again.
At the Vatican II Anti-council (1962-1965), Ratzinger was one of the heretical Modernist leaders who subverted the Church from within and is now trying to exonerate himself from all blame. Even at death’s door, he is dishonest and unapologetic. Benedict-Ratzinger became the Second Padeophile Newpope in 2005, succeeding his mentor, the First Paedophile Newpope JPII-Wojtyla. Ratzinger has remained a heretic Modernist his entire life, while occasionally slopping on a veneer of conservatism to fool the clueless Neocon Newchurchers. He was never “traditionalist,” as some Neocon Newchurchers tried to persuade the world at the time and have now recanted from that contention. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by BBC News.]
True Catholics, presbyter Ratzinger was in fact the leader at the Vatican II Anti-council who personally devised the “subsists in” heresy that was written into the new constitution for the Newchurch, Lumen gentium, in 1964. This heresy denies the dogma that the Catholic Church is the one true Church of Christ, but instead claims that Christ’s Church “subsists in” heretical Protestantism, infidel Mohammedanism, pagan Hinduism, and atheistic Buddhism. Even Newchurchers have finally had it with Benedict-Ratzinger. His letter has sparked fierce criticism from theologians who claim that it is “deeply flawed” and does not address structural issues that abetted sex-assault cover-ups or Ratzinger’s own abominable 24-year rule as Prefect of Paedophiles.